Comments on: Dissing Food Can Be Dangerous

By: Jan (Family Bites)

Jan (Family Bites) — Sat, 29 May 2010 01:47:05 +0000

Very interesting…I honestly wouldn’t have given it much thought but I suppose it’s something to consider. Great post!

By: Cheftometrist

Cheftometrist — Fri, 28 May 2010 17:25:58 +0000

Ugh. Yeah, I’m with Stephanie. Whatever happened to freedom of speech? How can a society be productive with laws like this?

By: diannejacob

diannejacob — Thu, 27 May 2010 20:41:38 +0000

Yes, and apparently we have their lawyers to thank for making them feel safe about doing so!

By: Nancy

Nancy — Thu, 27 May 2010 16:12:03 +0000

Hi Dianne,
Currently, I believe 46 states have regulations of this nature – they of course are all not the same which makes it a bit challenging to offer general advice!! Bottom line, for those who want to write about nutrition, they should check with their own state about what the specific regulations are in their state and if they are really concerned, consult an attorney!

By: Stephanie - Wasabimon

Stephanie - Wasabimon — Thu, 27 May 2010 15:49:38 +0000

Wow, this made me want to throw up. Freedom of speech what? I am completely and utterly disappointed in the state of our society.

By: Carla

Carla — Thu, 27 May 2010 15:03:02 +0000

I think it’s important for people who “think” about food to voice their opinions. The vast majority of Americans haven’t thought about what they put into their mouths or why or how much to their detriment. People are beginning to question food sources, whether processed or local, because of Michael Pollan and many others and I sense a ground swell of interest in eating a cleaner, healthier, less processed, low fat, etc. diet from many middle aged Americans who never thought previously about the where, what, how and why let alone the politics of food. There are many ways to live a healthier and more tasteful life. Thank you to those who offer us suggestions on how to go about it.

By: diannejacob

diannejacob — Thu, 27 May 2010 03:49:56 +0000

Interesting about the California law. I wonder how many other states have requirements like this. Thanks, Nancy.

By: diannejacob

diannejacob — Thu, 27 May 2010 03:46:00 +0000

That is a good question. In Oprah’s case the cattlemen tried to prove that the price of cattle futures fell as a result of her broadcast show. Clearly you and I wouldn’t have that kind of affect!

By: nancy

nancy — Thu, 27 May 2010 01:27:39 +0000

Another great and timely topic!! In most cases companies don’t pursue this because it simply isn ‘t worth it from a financial standpoint. However, in the case of Oprah and CBS I believe they were pursued because both are influential with their audiences and are considered “trusted” sources.
Both Michael Pollan and Carrie Vitt are certainly entitled to voice their opinion on nutrition. However, since neither is a licensed healthcare provider they cannot , by California law, state that any food will cure (or prevent) any disease, disorder or condition.
The old saying “you are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts” comes to mind. I think food writers/ bloggers need to be careful in terms of what they write. Stating your opinion is absolutely fine – however, stating it as fact can at best undermine your credibility and at worst land you in the position of Oprah and CBS.

By: Cristina

Cristina — Wed, 26 May 2010 23:36:26 +0000

Hadn’t considered that it would be an issue if you’re stating an opinion. Who’d thought it could be subject to libel when food writing about a generic product (produce, meat, etc.)? It’s in the way you phrase it and how high profile you are. If no one’s ever heard of you…does anyone care?

Great post! Definitely food for thought.