<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separating Hype, Opinion and Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Pithy snippets about food writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:04:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Parisbreakfasts</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Parisbreakfasts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...I realize I may be doing a lot of &quot;puff&quot; pieces, usually because I really do like something like La Maison du Chocolat ganache the other day. What&#039;s not to like?
But I&#039;m also keenly aware that readers don&#039;t like to hear negative comments, well my readers. It can be a difficult balance sometimes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;I realize I may be doing a lot of &#8220;puff&#8221; pieces, usually because I really do like something like La Maison du Chocolat ganache the other day. What&#8217;s not to like?<br />
But I&#8217;m also keenly aware that readers don&#8217;t like to hear negative comments, well my readers. It can be a difficult balance sometimes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-654</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t realize that an all positive review was considered a puff piece.  Thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize that an all positive review was considered a puff piece.  Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitchen Butterfly</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitchen Butterfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dianne, I&#039;d never heard of puff piece :-) Now I know. Thanks...and very interesting read too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dianne, I&#8217;d never heard of puff piece <img src='http://diannej.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Now I know. Thanks&#8230;and very interesting read too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith Kramer</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-524</guid>
		<description>As usual, spot on. I have one disagreement though. I don&#039;t think a review needs to be overwhelming positive.  I think it needs to be honest so if something is more negative than positive that needs to come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, spot on. I have one disagreement though. I don&#8217;t think a review needs to be overwhelming positive.  I think it needs to be honest so if something is more negative than positive that needs to come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diannejacob</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>diannejacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Re your comment about the free trip, please come back to my blog (www.diannej.com/blog) and re-enter it. I have just posted on the Sweepstakes, and your comment needs to be on the correct page. I&#039;m going to delete the one you made earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Re your comment about the free trip, please come back to my blog (www.diannej.com/blog) and re-enter it. I have just posted on the Sweepstakes, and your comment needs to be on the correct page. I&#8217;m going to delete the one you made earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molly (the dinner files)</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>molly (the dinner files)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Thanks for addressing this, Dianne (your earlier post on freebies was also great). What I see out in the field is that publications that used to have very strict standards are loosening them *a lot* because of budget issues. Freebies in food, travel, and lifestyle writing are everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for addressing this, Dianne (your earlier post on freebies was also great). What I see out in the field is that publications that used to have very strict standards are loosening them *a lot* because of budget issues. Freebies in food, travel, and lifestyle writing are everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
