<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Separating Hype, Opinion and Journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Pithy snippets about food writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 08:48:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqueline Church</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-55898</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-55898</guid>
		<description>If I had a nickel for every email I get asking if the writer can do a guest post or revise a post I&#039;ve already written to include a link to their client...that just makes me crazy. It seems many have decided that PR now can be free...just ask a blogger. They&#039;ll do it for free. Disgusting. There has been a definite uptick in this type of email - probably get one a week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had a nickel for every email I get asking if the writer can do a guest post or revise a post I&#8217;ve already written to include a link to their client&#8230;that just makes me crazy. It seems many have decided that PR now can be free&#8230;just ask a blogger. They&#8217;ll do it for free. Disgusting. There has been a definite uptick in this type of email &#8211; probably get one a week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diannejacob</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-7667</link>
		<dc:creator>diannejacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 00:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-7667</guid>
		<description>Yes, these are good points and probably true.

I find that people have unrealistic fears about &quot;being negative.&quot; It&#039;s not about writing a whole negative review. There&#039;s a way to  be &quot;less than positive&quot; without making personal attacks or being nasty. It&#039;s about constructive criticism and a balanced approach. That is much harder work than just gushing over a product. Take a look at a movie reviewer&#039;s work and you will see what I mean. If a reviewer only wrote glowing reviews he or she would be out of work soon.

There is no reason for a company to cut you off if you write a balanced, well thought-out review.

Agreed that it is easier to be positive. It is probably easier not to edit your own work also, no?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, these are good points and probably true.</p>
<p>I find that people have unrealistic fears about &#8220;being negative.&#8221; It&#8217;s not about writing a whole negative review. There&#8217;s a way to  be &#8220;less than positive&#8221; without making personal attacks or being nasty. It&#8217;s about constructive criticism and a balanced approach. That is much harder work than just gushing over a product. Take a look at a movie reviewer&#8217;s work and you will see what I mean. If a reviewer only wrote glowing reviews he or she would be out of work soon.</p>
<p>There is no reason for a company to cut you off if you write a balanced, well thought-out review.</p>
<p>Agreed that it is easier to be positive. It is probably easier not to edit your own work also, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Adams</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-7661</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 23:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-7661</guid>
		<description>Hmmm,...maybe it&#039;s not so much that your readers don&#039;t like reading negative comments but that you don&#039;t like writing them. If you received the thing or trip you are reviewing for free, you probably want more and if you write negatively, you might not get any other trips or freebies. If you did pay for it yourself, it may be hard to admit that something wasn&#039;t worth the money for instance. 

Personally I think I am pretty objective, but I&#039;ll admit, it&#039;s easier to be positive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm,&#8230;maybe it&#8217;s not so much that your readers don&#8217;t like reading negative comments but that you don&#8217;t like writing them. If you received the thing or trip you are reviewing for free, you probably want more and if you write negatively, you might not get any other trips or freebies. If you did pay for it yourself, it may be hard to admit that something wasn&#8217;t worth the money for instance. </p>
<p>Personally I think I am pretty objective, but I&#8217;ll admit, it&#8217;s easier to be positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parisbreakfasts</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>Parisbreakfasts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-762</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...I realize I may be doing a lot of &quot;puff&quot; pieces, usually because I really do like something like La Maison du Chocolat ganache the other day. What&#039;s not to like?
But I&#039;m also keenly aware that readers don&#039;t like to hear negative comments, well my readers. It can be a difficult balance sometimes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;I realize I may be doing a lot of &#8220;puff&#8221; pieces, usually because I really do like something like La Maison du Chocolat ganache the other day. What&#8217;s not to like?<br />
But I&#8217;m also keenly aware that readers don&#8217;t like to hear negative comments, well my readers. It can be a difficult balance sometimes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-654</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t realize that an all positive review was considered a puff piece.  Thanks for the clarification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t realize that an all positive review was considered a puff piece.  Thanks for the clarification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kitchen Butterfly</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-616</link>
		<dc:creator>Kitchen Butterfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-616</guid>
		<description>Thanks Dianne, I&#039;d never heard of puff piece :-) Now I know. Thanks...and very interesting read too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dianne, I&#8217;d never heard of puff piece <img src='http://diannej.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Now I know. Thanks&#8230;and very interesting read too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith Kramer</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-524</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-524</guid>
		<description>As usual, spot on. I have one disagreement though. I don&#039;t think a review needs to be overwhelming positive.  I think it needs to be honest so if something is more negative than positive that needs to come out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, spot on. I have one disagreement though. I don&#8217;t think a review needs to be overwhelming positive.  I think it needs to be honest so if something is more negative than positive that needs to come out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: diannejacob</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-236</link>
		<dc:creator>diannejacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-236</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Re your comment about the free trip, please come back to my blog (www.diannej.com/blog) and re-enter it. I have just posted on the Sweepstakes, and your comment needs to be on the correct page. I&#039;m going to delete the one you made earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Re your comment about the free trip, please come back to my blog (www.diannej.com/blog) and re-enter it. I have just posted on the Sweepstakes, and your comment needs to be on the correct page. I&#8217;m going to delete the one you made earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: molly (the dinner files)</title>
		<link>http://diannej.com/blog/2009/09/separating-hype-opinion-and-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>molly (the dinner files)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 19:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://diannej.com/blog/?p=617#comment-235</guid>
		<description>Thanks for addressing this, Dianne (your earlier post on freebies was also great). What I see out in the field is that publications that used to have very strict standards are loosening them *a lot* because of budget issues. Freebies in food, travel, and lifestyle writing are everywhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for addressing this, Dianne (your earlier post on freebies was also great). What I see out in the field is that publications that used to have very strict standards are loosening them *a lot* because of budget issues. Freebies in food, travel, and lifestyle writing are everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

